The Open Door Web Site |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE MANN-WHITNEY U-TEST This page is available as a pdf download Sometimes distributions of variables do not show a normal distribution, or the samples taken are so small that one cannot tell if they are part of a normal distribution or not. Using the t-test to tell if there is a significant difference between samples is not appropriate here. The following example will illustrate the method. The size of leaves taken from bramble bushes were measured to see if there is a difference between the size of the leaves growing in full sunlight and those growing in the shade.
The Mann-Whitney U-test is chosen because the sample size is so small it is not clear if these are samples taken from normally distributed data.
Note where the values are the same and share the same rank, take an average of the rank values. 4. Total the ranks of each sample R1 and R2 (see the bottom of the table above). 5. Calculate the U values for both samples:
6; Use the table to find the critical value for the U statistic at the 5% level for samples of this size (n1 = 8 and n2 = 8). 7. Reject the Null Hypothesis if the smallest value of U1 or U2 is below Ucrit. In this case U2 is below 13 we can reject the Null Hypothesis and accept the Alternative Hypothesis. The difference between the size of the bramble leaves in the light and the dark is significant for P>0.05. Bramble leaves in the dark seem to be significantly bigger. |
© Paul Billiet 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||