|
|
THE STUDY GUIDE
EABJM TERMINALE: HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY REVISION
DOCUMENT:
KENNEDY AND KHRUSHCHEV STATEMENTS: CUBA
Kennedy to
Nation:
"Good
evening, my fellow citizens: This Government,
as promised, has
maintained the closest surveillance of the
Soviet military build up on the island
of Cuba. Within the past week, unmistakable
evidence has established the fact
that a series of offensive Missile sites is
now in preparation on that imprisoned
island. The purpose of these bases can be
none other than to provide a nuclear
strike capability against the Western
Hemisphere.
Upon receiving the first preliminary hard
information of this nature last
Tuesday morning at 9 a.m., I directed that
our surveillance be stepped up. And
having now confirmed and completed our
evaluation of the evidence and our
decision on a course of action, this
Government feels obliged to report this new
crisis to you in fullest detail.
The characteristics of these new missile
sites indicate two distinct types of
installations. Several of them include medium
range ballistic missiles, capable of
carrying a nuclear warhead for a distance of
more than 1000 nautical miles. Each
of these missiles, in short, is capable of
striking Washington, D.C., the Panama
Canal, Cape Canaveral, Mexico City, or any
other city in the south eastern part of
the United States, in Central America, or in
the Caribbean area.....
This urgent transformation of Cuba into an
important strategic base-by the
presence of these large, long-range, and
clearly offensive weapons of sudden
mass destruction constitutes an explicit
threat to the peace and security of all the
Americas, in flagrant and deliberate defiance
of the Rio Pact of 1947, the
traditions of this Nation and hemisphere, the
joint resolution of the 87th
Congress, the Charter of the United Nations,
and my own public warnings to
the Soviets on September 4 and 13- This
action also contradicts the repeated
assurances of Soviet spokesmen, both publicly
and privately delivered, that
the arms build up in Cuba would retain its
original defensive character, and
that the Soviet Union had no need or desire
to station strategic missiles on the
territory of any other nation......
Only last Thursday, as evidence of this rapid
offensive build up was already
in my hand, Soviet Foreign Minister Gromyko
told me in my office that
he was instructed to make it clear once
again, as he said his government had
already done, that Soviet assistance to Cuba,
and I quote, "pursued solely for
the purpose of contributing to the defence
capabilities of Cuba," that, and I
quote him, "training by Soviet specialists of
Cuban nationals in handling
defensive armaments was by no means
offensive, and if it were otherwise,"
Mr. Gromyko went on, "the Soviet Government
would never become
involved in rendering such assistance." That
statement also was false.
Neither the United States of America nor the
world community of nations
can tolerate deliberate deception and
offensive threats on the part of any nation,
large or small. We no longer live in a world
where only the actual firing of
weapons represents an efficient challenge to
a nation's security to constitute
maximum peril. Nuclear weapons are so
destructive and ballistic missiles are so
swift, that any substantially increased
possibility of their use or any sudden
change in their deployment may well be
regarded as a definite threat to peace.
For many years, both the Soviet Union and the
United States, recognizing this
fact, have deployed strategic nuclear weapons
with great care, never upsetting
the precarious status quo which insured that
these weapons would not be used
in the absence of some vital challenge. Our
own strategic missiles have never
been transferred to the territory of any
other nation under a cloak of secrecy and
deception; and our history-unlike that of the
Soviets since the end of World
War II-demonstrates that we have no desire to
dominate or conquer any other
nation or impose our system upon its people.
Nevertheless, American citizens
have become adjusted to living daily on the
bull's-eye of Soviet missiles located
inside the U.S.S.R. or in submarines.
....this sudden, clandestine decision to
station strategic weapons for the first time
outside of Soviet soil- is a deliberately
provocative and unjustified change in the
status quo which cannot be accepted by this
country, if our courage and our commitments
are ever to be trusted again by either friend
or foe.
The 1930's taught us a clear lesson:
aggressive conduct, if allowed to go
unchecked and unchallenged, ultimately leads
to war. This nation is opposed to war.
Our policy has been one of patience and
restraint... But now further action is
required ......
Acting, therefore, in the defence of our own
security and of the entire Western
Hemisphere, and under the authority end
trusted to me by the
Constitution as endorsed by the resolution of
the Congress, I have directed that
the following initial steps be taken
immediately:
First: To halt this offensive build up, a
strict quarantine on all offensive
military in equipment under shipment to Cuba
is being initiated. All ships of
any kind bound for Cuba from whatever nation
or port will, if found to
contain cargoes of offensive weapons, be
turned back. This quarantine will be
extended, if needed, to other types of cargo
and carriers. We are not at this
time, however, denying the necessities of
life as the Soviets attempted to do in
their Berlin blockade of I948-
Second: I have directed the continued and
increased close surveillance of Cuba
and its military build up.......
Third: It shall be the policy of this Nation
to regard any nuclear missile launched
from Cuba against any nation in the Western
Hemisphere as an attack by
the Soviet Union on the United States,
requiring a full retaliatory response uponthe Soviet Union....
Fifth: We are calling tonight for an
immediate meeting of the Organ of
Consultation under the Organization of
American States, to consider this
threat to hemispheric security and to invoke
articles 6 and 8 of the Rio Treaty in
support of all necessary action. The United
Nations Charter allows for
regional security arrangements-and the
nations of this hemisphere decided
long ago against the military presence of
outside powers. Our other allies
around the world have also been alerted.
Sixth: Under the Charter of the United
Nations, we are asking tonight that an
emergency meeting of the Security Council be
convoked without delay to
take action against this latest Soviet threat
to world peace. Our resolution
will call for the prompt dismantling and
withdrawal of all offensive
weapons in Cuba, under the supervision of
U.N. observers, before the
quarantine can be lifted.
Seventh and finally: I call upon Chairman
Khrushchev to halt and
eliminate this clandestine, reckless, and
provocative threat to world peace and
to stable relations between our two nations.
I call upon him further to
abandon this course of world domination, and
to join in an historic effort to
end the perilous arms race and to transform
the history of man. He has an
opportunity now to move the world back from
the abyss of destruction-by
returning to his government's own words that
it had no need to station
missiles outside its own territory, and
withdrawing these weapons from
Cuba- by refraining from any action which
will widen or deepen the present
crisis- and then by participating in a search
for peaceful and permanent solutions.
This Nation is prepared to present its case
against the Soviet threat to peace,
and our own proposals for a peaceful world,
at any time and in any forum-in
the OAS, in the United Nations, or in any
other meeting that could be
useful-without limiting our freedom of
action. We have in the past made
strenuous efforts to limit the spread of
nuclear weapons. We have
proposed the elimination of all arms and
military bases in a fair and effective
disarmament treaty. We are prepared to
discuss new proposals for the removal
of tensions on both sides- including the
possibilities of a genuinely
independent Cuba, free to determine its own
destiny. We have no wish to war
with the Soviet Union- for we are a peaceful
people who desire to live in
peace with all other peoples.
But it is difficult to settle or even discuss
these problems in an atmosphere of
intimidation. That is why this latest Soviet
threat-or any oilier threat
which is made either independently or in
response to our actions this
week-must and will be met with determination.
Any hostile move any-where in the world against the safety and
freedom of peoples to whom we
are committed- including in particular the
brave people of West Berlin- will
be met by whatever action is needed.
Finally, I want to say a few words to the
captive people of Cuba, to whom this
speech is being directly carried by special
radio facilities. I speak to you as a
friend....The path we have chosen for the present is
full of hazards, as all paths are- but it
is the one most consistent with our character
and courage as a nation and our
commitments around the world. The cost of
freedom is always high-but
Americans have always paid it. And one path
we shall never choose, and that is the path of surrender or submission.
Our goal is not the victory of might, but the
vindication of right-not peace at
the expense of freedom, but both peace and
freedom, here in this hemisphere,
and, we hope, around the world. God willing,
that goal will be achieved.
Thank you and good night.
" |
Khrushchev to John F. Kennedy
"Dear Mr.
President,
...Imagine, Mr. President, what if we were to
present to you such an ultimatum as you have
presented to us by your actions. How would you
react to it? I think you would be outraged at
such a move on our part. And this we would
understand.
Having presented these conditions to us, Mr.
President, you have thrown down the gauntlet. Who
asked you to do this? By what right have you done
this? Our ties with the Republic of Cuba, as well
as our relations with other nations, regardless
of their political system, concern only the two
countries between which these relations exist.
And, if it were a matter of quarantine as
mentioned in your letter, then, as is customary
in international practice, it can be established
only by states agreeing between themselves, and
not by some third party. Quarantines exist, for
example, on agricultural goods and
products. However, in this case we are not
talking about quarantines, but rather about much
more serious matters, and you yourself understand
this." |
|
|