|
|
THE STUDY GUIDE
EABJM TERMINALE: HISTORY REVISION
ESSAYS: PAST
EXAMPLES AND MODELS
France during World War
Two
|
It is quite wrong to think of
Pétain as a quaint octogenarian who was unaware
of what was going on. He , as Head of State, was
the originator of policies, directing his PMs
(Laval, Flandin, Darlan, Laval) and pursuing an
understanding with Germany that he himself called
COLLABORATION. The 'National Revolution'
(including 'Travaille, Famille, Patrie) would
find a place for France in the new 'Europe'. At
first, he certainly hoped for mutual benefit and
reciprocal arrangements with Germany. Perhaps
towards the end it became a servile acceptance of
German demands. The support that he received was
genuine...which does not mean that the French
were pro-German or Nazi. Most put their faith in
the man who had already saved France once. |
|
After the war,
it was natural that the French believed in the
idea of 40 million resisters. 'Papy a fait la
Résistance' was a popular film as late as the
1980's. But this has long been seen as a myth,
certainly since Robert Paxton, whose book
Vichy France: Old Guard and New Order
(1972) challenged the idea of French resistance
under Nazi occupation. Paxton showed that the
Vichy regime had sought real collaboration with
Germany—consistently offering more than the
Germans asked, particularly in the area of
anti-Semitic policies—to carve out a role for
France under Hitler in a future New European
Order. He also found that among the French
population the Vichy government remained popular
until it became clear that Germany would
certainly lose the war. |
Being
continued....check it out Saturday morning. For your
talk you should have themes on the issues. Work out a
brief introduction which captures the flavour of the
controversies, then have paragraphs on 1. Pétain and
Collaboration. How much did they anticipate German
demands? 2. Why there was so little resistance at
first. There is no need to be critical! It is worth
noting that the communists were hampered by the
Nazi-Soviet Pact and that it was difficult to resist in
the south because there were no Germans! (at least
until 1943). But then there was a conservative and
traditionalist link going back to the early 1930s. 3
What the resistance was when it came. Look at a) de
Gaulle and his lot in London...Soustelle, Moulin,
Michelet, Monnet.....b) South...Combat, Libération-Sud,
Franc-Tirreur..; c) North. Libération-Nord, Ceux de la
Résistance, etc, d) Across zones. Front National (not
Le Pen!) and PCF from 1941) 4. And therefore what
contribution the French actually made to their
liberation. What did the resistance achieve in the end?
If that is not enough, or comes across as dull, you can
pad it out a bit with why France fell at the
beginning.......
|
|