The Open Door Web Site
HOME PAGE BIOLOGY CHEMISTRY PHYSICS ELECTRONICS HISTORY HISTORY of SCI & TECH MATH STUDIES LEARN FRENCH STUDY GUIDE PHOTO GALLERY
ATOMIC and NUCLEAR ELECTRICITY and MAGNETISM MEASUREMENTS MECHANICS OPTICS PRACTICAL WORK QUESTIONS RELATIVITY THERMAL PHYSICS WAVES
MEASUREMENTS
Google
Custom Search
Quantifying the Uncertainty in a Measurement
The number we write as the uncertainty tells the reader about the instrument used to make the measurement.  
We assume that the instrument has been used correctly.
Consider the following examples.  
   
Example 1: Using a Ruler  
The length of the object being measured seems to be somewhere near 4.3cm (but it is certainly not exactly 4.3cm).  
The result could therefore be stated as  
4.3cm half the smallest division on the ruler  
In choosing an uncertainty equal to half the smallest division on the ruler, we are accepting a range of possible results equal to the size of the smallest division on the ruler.  
   
However, do you notice something which has not yet been taken into account?  
In situations like this one has a tendency to concentrate on the right hand end of the ruler.  
A measurement of length is, in fact, a measurement of two positions and then a subtraction.  
Was the end of the object exactly opposite the zero of the ruler?  
This becomes more obvious if we consider the measurement again, as shown here.  
   
  We now notice that the left-hand end of the object is not exactly opposite the 2cm mark of the ruler.

It is nearer to 2cm than to 2.1cm, but this measurement is subject to the same level of uncertainty.
 
   
Therefore the length of the object is  
(6.3 0.05)cm - (2.0 0.05)cm  
so, the length can be between  
(6.3 + 0.05) - (2.0 - 0.05) and (6.3 - 0.05) - (2.0 + 0.05)cm  
that is, between  
4.4cm and 4.2cm  
We now see that the range of possible results is 0.2cm, so we write  
length = 4.3cm 0.1cm  
   
so, in general, we state the result of a measurement as  
reading the smallest division on the measuring instrument  
   
Example 2: Using a Stop-Watch  
Consider using a stop-watch which measures to 1/100 of a second to find the time for a pendulum to oscillate once.  
Suppose that this time is about 1s.  
This means that the smallest division on the watch is only about 1% of the time being measured.  
We could therefore write the result as  
T = 1s 0.01s  
which is equivalent to saying that the time T is between  
0.99s and 1.01s  
This sounds quite good until you remember that the reaction-time of the person using the watch might be about 0.1s.  
Let us be pessimistic and say that the person's reaction-time is 0.15s.  
Now considering the measurement again, with a possible 0.15s at the starting and stopping time of the watch, we should now state the result as  
T = 1s (0.01+ 0.3)s  
In other words, T is between about 0.7s and 1.3s  
We could probably have guessed the answer to this degree of precision even without a stop-watch!  
   
Conclusions from the preceding discussion  
If we accept that an uncertainty (sometimes called an indeterminacy) of about 1% of the measurement being made is reasonable, then  
a) a ruler, marked in mm, is useful for making measurements of distances of about 10cm or greater.
b) a manually operated stop-watch is useful for measuring times of about 30s or more (for precise measurements of shorter times, an electronically operated watch must be used)
 
 
SITE MAP
WHAT'S NEW
ABOUT
PRIVACY
COPYRIGHT
SPONSORSHIP
DONATIONS
ADVERTISING
 

© The Open Door Teambr>2016
Any questions or
problems regarding
this site should be
addressed to
the webmaster

David Hoult 2017

Hosted By
Web Hosting by HostCentric

 
SiteLock
 
 
Measurements Index Page